@article{oai:u-nagano.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000623,
 author = {日下, 正一 and Kusaka, Shoichi},
 journal = {長野県短期大学紀要, Journal of Nagano Prefectural College},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {40002771449, application/pdf, The purposes of this study were (1) to examine how non-conservers (or imcomplete conservers) dissolved or solved “real contradictions”, i. e. the contradiction that they experienced when they were faced with conservation phenomena, and (2) to attempt to construct conservation schemata through these contradiction and practical action. This study placed special emphasis on the arguments for conservation (e. g. “identités simples ou additives”, ”réversibilité par inversion” and “compensation”). The results showed that : (1) Imconplete conservers could solve “real contradictions” by means of their conservation schemata, but nonconservers could not. These findings suggested that the role of these contradictions was to induce or reactivate the exsisting schemata (or arguments for conservation) rather than to construct new conservation schemata. (2) The contradiction, however, appeared to serve to construct new schemata in cooperation with practical actions, but this supposition required further study.},
 pages = {67--82},
 title = {重さの保存の認識と矛盾},
 volume = {41},
 year = {1986},
 yomi = {クサカ, ショウイチ}
}